Blog Layout

Reportable tax position expansion stalled
Liz Gibbs • January 4, 2020

The Reportable Tax Position schedule was first introduced in 2012 as a way for the ATO to keep an eye on contestable or material tax positions taken by public and multinational companies. Its recent proposal to expand the schedule to large private companies and corporate tax groups has experienced pushback from various stakeholders. As a result, the ATO is now consulting with industry groups and advisers to co-design the schedule with a view to implement it in 2020-21 financial year.

The expansion of the Reportable Tax Position (RTP) schedule to large private companies and corporate tax groups have been shelved by the Tax Office until the 2020-21 financial year (ie 1 July 2020) amid pushback from various stakeholders over the lack of clarity surrounding its practical implementation. The ATO notes it is now working with industry groups and advisers from the private groups market to co-design the RTP schedule for implementation.

The RTP schedule was first introduced in 2012 and only applied to the top 100 public and multinational companies. By 2018, it had been expanded to all public and multinational companies with a total business income exceeding $25m that are part of an economic group with total business income of greater than $250m.

The actual schedule is designed to provide a mechanism for taxpayers to disclose their most contestable and material tax positions to the ATO and inform it about areas of tax law that may require further clarification or certainty.

According to the ATO, the schedule allows it to tailor its engagement and work with the companies or groups on complex high-risk arrangements and to better understand the tax risks for those taxpayers. Conversely, it also allows the companies or groups involved to make informed decisions about their tax positions or potential tax positions that are considered to be high risk arrangements.

The specific types of disclosures required by the schedule is divided into 3 categories:

  • Category A: tax uncertainty reflected in the taxpayer's income tax return – where a position that is argued is about likely to be correct as incorrect, or less likely to be correct than incorrect (similar to reasonably arguable position which applies generally to all taxpayers).
  • Category B: tax uncertainty reflected in financial statements – where uncertainty about taxes payable or recoverable is recognised/disclosed in the taxpayer or related party's financial statements.
  • Category C: specific risks and issues – based on public advice and guidance including Taxpayer Alerts, practical compliance guidelines and observations in compliance products.

Considering the advantage of early intervention for risky arrangements, it is clear to see why the ATO would want to apply the schedule to as many companies or groups as possible, whether they be private or public. As initially proposed, the RTP schedule expansion would've applied to all companies with a total business income exceeding $25m that are part of an economic group with total business income of greater than $250m. It would've included standalone companies with total business income in excess of $250m and would not have included trusts or individuals.

Therefore, the expansion would've been aligned with the requirements for public and multinational companies, and according to the ATO, create a level playing field among large corporate groups by ensuring all large businesses have the same obligation to disclose their most contestable and material tax positions, regardless of whether they are public or private. The ATO may eventually have ambitions to slowly expand the RTP schedule to all entities or lower the income threshold, but for now, it only impacts the very large end of town.

How does this affect me?

If you're involved in a large private company or corporate group, we can help you work out whether you'll need to lodge RTP schedules going forward. If you're a smaller company or an individual and have taken an uncertain position in your tax return, we can help you figure out whether that position is reasonably arguable. Contact us today.

IMPORTANT: This communication is factual only and does not constitute financial advice. Please consult a licensed financial planner for advice tailored to your financial circumstances
 Email us at Robert Goodman Accountants at 
.  © Copyright 2020
 
Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
 
Brought to you by Robert Goodman Accountants. 
 
Office open
By Liz Gibbs March 10, 2025
With thanks to all Energex and Emergency services Crew, our electricity has been reconnected and our office is open from today 11 March. We hope you and your loved ones are safe and well following cyclone Alfred. These past few days have been challenging for many, and our thoughts are with everyone affected.
By Liz Gibbs March 10, 2025
Due to a power outage affecting the entire Samford area, the RGA Practice will be operating remotely today, 10 March, until electricity is restored. Please be assured that our team remains available and can be reached at 07 3289 1700. We appreciate your understanding and support during this time. Stay safe, and we look forward to seeing you soon.
Cyclone Alfred
By Liz Gibbs March 5, 2025
As Tropical Cyclone Alfred approaches, we want to remind everyone to take necessary precautions and ensure their safety. We have received some important information that we believe is crucial to share with you to help you prepare for the severe weather conditions ahead.
Work Health and Safety (Sexual Harassment) Amendment Regulation 2024
By Liz Gibbs February 26, 2025
In a significant move to combat workplace sexual harassment, Amendments to the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (as per the Work Health and Safety (Sexual Harassment) Amendment Regulation 2024) will soon commence on 1 March 2025.
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
The amount of money that can be transferred to a tax-free retirement account will increase to $2m on 1 July 2025.
What happens to your super when you die?
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies?
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? We look at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But, is the issue as simple as it seems?
Babyboomer wealth
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
“Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke.
Penalty for False R&D claims
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
A joint investigation involving the ATO found that, between 2014 and 2017, a Sydney business coach promoted unlawful tax schemes encouraging clients to lodge over-inflated, inaccurate or unsubstantiated research and development ('R&D') tax incentive claims
SMSF lodgement due dates
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
All trustees of SMSFs with assets (including super contributions or any other investments) as at 30 June 2024 need to lodge an SMSF annual return ('SAR') for the 2023/24 financial year.
More Posts
Share by: