Blog Layout

Less tax for some working holiday makers?
Liz Gibbs • January 6, 2020

A recent case on the "backpacker tax" received wide ranging media coverage and was hyped as a win for all working holiday makers. However, take a closer look, and it is clear that the case has a much narrower application than reported. For example, it would only apply to certain working holiday makers that are considered to be tax residents of Australia and have a specific clause in a Double Taxation Agreement from their home country with Australia. Coupled with the ATO still considering an appeal, this area of law is far from settled.

In a decision that was hailed by various media outlets as monumental, the Federal Court's decision that a backpacker would not have to pay extra "backpacker tax", was touted to have wide ranging application to all holiday makers. However, upon further analysis, the impact of the decision is very much narrower than first thought.

The working holiday rate ("backpacker tax") generally applied from 1 January 2017 to individuals that have either a Subclass 417 (working holiday) or 462 (work and holiday) visas. In essence, the first $37,000 of "working holiday taxable income" is taxed at 15% and then the balance is taxed at the standard rates applicable to residents.

Thus, working holiday makers are taxed at a higher rate on the first $37,000 than residents as they do not get the benefit of the tax-free threshold ($18,200 for 2019-20).

The case centred on a British citizen (Ms Addy) who lived in Australia for a period of almost 2 years, unlike other working holiday makers, during most of her time here, she lived in the same share house accommodation in Sydney with a friend and only left for short stints to travel to other parts of Australia. Essentially, the case came down to whether or not Ms Addy was a resident of Australia and that if she was a resident, would the non-discrimination clause (Article 25) in the Australian-UK Double Taxation Agreement (DTA) prevent her from being taxed in a more burdensome way.

The answer to both of these questions were answered by the Court in the affirmative. Due to her lack of transience during her stay in Australia, Ms Addy was found to be an Australian resident for tax purposes. Following on from that, the Court also found that the DTA prevented Ms Addy from being taxed at the higher working holiday tax rate.

From the facts, it can be seen that the practical significance of the decision is quite limited. Firstly, the individual would have to be on a specific working holiday visa for the tax to apply. Secondly, most individuals on that visa would not be tax residents due to the transient nature of their stay. For example, another recent case involved a US citizen who during her stay in Australia worked in more than one city, moved houses relatively frequently and travelled in Australia quite extensively, and thus was not found to be a resident for tax purposes. Finally, not all DTAs have a non-discrimination clause such as the one between Australia and the UK, hence, a working holiday maker from a country lacking a DTA or a DTA with an anti-discrimination provision with Australia would still be taxed at the working holiday rate even if they are found to be tax residents.

According to analysis from the ATO, the decision would only apply to working holiday makers from Chile, Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Turkey and UK. In 2018 only around 36% of the total number of working holiday maker visas were issued to individuals from these countries. Therefore, this decision will only affect a small percentage of individuals, of which an even smaller proportion would be Australia tax residents. The ATO noted it is still considering the decision of the Court and may appeal, so stay tuned.

Are you a working holiday maker?

If you're unsure whether this decision affects you, we can help you work out whether you're a tax resident and whether you may be eligible to pay less tax on your working holiday income. Remember, different individual circumstances could mean very different outcomes, contact us today for tailored advice.

Email us at Robert Goodman Accountants at 
.  © Copyright 2020
 
Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
 
Brought to you by Robert Goodman Accountants. 
Office open
By Liz Gibbs March 10, 2025
With thanks to all Energex and Emergency services Crew, our electricity has been reconnected and our office is open from today 11 March. We hope you and your loved ones are safe and well following cyclone Alfred. These past few days have been challenging for many, and our thoughts are with everyone affected.
By Liz Gibbs March 10, 2025
Due to a power outage affecting the entire Samford area, the RGA Practice will be operating remotely today, 10 March, until electricity is restored. Please be assured that our team remains available and can be reached at 07 3289 1700. We appreciate your understanding and support during this time. Stay safe, and we look forward to seeing you soon.
Cyclone Alfred
By Liz Gibbs March 5, 2025
As Tropical Cyclone Alfred approaches, we want to remind everyone to take necessary precautions and ensure their safety. We have received some important information that we believe is crucial to share with you to help you prepare for the severe weather conditions ahead.
Work Health and Safety (Sexual Harassment) Amendment Regulation 2024
By Liz Gibbs February 26, 2025
In a significant move to combat workplace sexual harassment, Amendments to the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (as per the Work Health and Safety (Sexual Harassment) Amendment Regulation 2024) will soon commence on 1 March 2025.
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
The amount of money that can be transferred to a tax-free retirement account will increase to $2m on 1 July 2025.
What happens to your super when you die?
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies?
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? We look at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But, is the issue as simple as it seems?
Babyboomer wealth
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
“Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke.
Penalty for False R&D claims
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
A joint investigation involving the ATO found that, between 2014 and 2017, a Sydney business coach promoted unlawful tax schemes encouraging clients to lodge over-inflated, inaccurate or unsubstantiated research and development ('R&D') tax incentive claims
SMSF lodgement due dates
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
All trustees of SMSFs with assets (including super contributions or any other investments) as at 30 June 2024 need to lodge an SMSF annual return ('SAR') for the 2023/24 financial year.
More Posts
Share by: