Salary sacrificing loopholes: are you receiving your full benefits?
Liz Gibbs • December 31, 2019

Salary sacrifice strategies are a great way to boost retirement savings. But unwelcome loopholes in the law prior to 1 January 2020 meant some workers may have been getting less than they bargained for. Fortunately, the government has taken action to fix this. 

From 1 January 2020

From 1 January 2020, salary sacrificed super contributions can't be used to reduce your super guarantee obligations, regardless of the amount your employee elects to salary sacrifice.

This means the salary sacrificed amount does not count towards your super guarantee (SG) obligations. A further change is that the super guarantee will be 9.5% of the employee's ordinary time earnings base. The base is the sum of:

  • the employee's OTE
  • the amount salary sacrificed from the employee's OTE.

Prior 1 January 2020

Prior to 1 January 2020, there were salary sacrificing loopholes that could adversely affect your retirement savings plans. Most workers understand that their employer must make compulsory super guarantee (SG) contributions of 9.5% of their salary and wages. However, things get a little tricky when an employee chooses to salary sacrifice – and it could have unintended consequences.

Under laws that existed prior to 1 January 2020, employees who sacrifice some of their salary in return for additional super contributions may end up receiving less than they expected because of the following two legal loopholes:

  • Employers may choose to count the salary sacrifice contributions they make towards satisfying their obligation to make minimum SG contributions of 9.5%.
  • Additionally, employers may calculate their 9.5% contributions liability based on the employee's reduced salary after deducting sacrificed amounts, rather than the pre-sacrifice salary.

The following example demonstrates how the old laws could have adversely affected a worker's savings strategy:

Kayla earns $100,000 p.a. from her employer. This means she's entitled to compulsory SG contributions of 9.5% of her $100,000 salary (ie $9,500). She therefore earns total remuneration of $109,500.

Kayla now arranges to salary sacrifice $10,000 of her salary as extra contributions, reducing her salary to $90,000. But under old laws, her employer was only required to make compulsory SG contributions of 9.5% of $90,000 (not $100,000), ie $8,550.

Another problem was that her $10,000 salary sacrifice contributions could count towards her employer's obligation to pay SG contributions. She could receive only $10,000 in total contributions plus $90,000 salary (meaning total remuneration of $100,000) and her employer wouldn't be in breach of SG laws.

When Kayla entered this arrangement she was expecting to receive contributions of $9,500 plus $10,000, a total of $19,500, while maintaining total remuneration of $109,500 (ie $90,000 salary plus $19,500 contributions). Clearly, the old laws produced a bad outcome for Kayla.

These loopholes possibly existed because salary sacrificing was not a widespread strategy when the SG laws were written.

In practice, many employers were not taking advantage of the loopholes and were instead honouring the employee's intended contributions strategy.

However, evidence suggests some employers were applying the rules differently. They may even do this inadvertently through their payroll processes.

A fix is now law from 1 January 2020

New laws apply from 1 January 2020 to close the loopholes by requiring employers to pay compulsory SG contributions at 9.5% of the   pre-sacrifice   amount of salary (that is, the salary actually paid to the employee   plus   any sacrificed salary). Further, any salary sacrifice contributions will not count towards satisfying the employer's obligation to make compulsory SG contributions.

What should workers and employers do?

The new laws will only apply to quarters beginning on or after 1 January 2020. All salary-sacrificing workers should check their arrangements now to ensure they're receiving the full intended benefit of the arrangement. They may need to specifically check the amounts going into their fund.

Employers should also ensure their payroll is compliant from 1 January 2020.

Review your salary sacrifice arrangement

Now is a good time to check that your retirement savings plan is on track. Contact us for assistance in checking your current arrangement or approaching an employer who may be paying less than you expect. We can also help you review your affairs to ensure you're implementing the most tax-effective sacrificing strategy.

Email us at Robert Goodman Accountants at 
.  © Copyright 2020
 
Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved.
 
Brought to you by Robert Goodman Accountants.
Superannuation Guarantee
By Liz Gibbs April 17, 2025
The superannuation guarantee rules are broad and, in some circumstances, extend beyond the definition of common law employees to some directors, contractors, entertainers, sports persons and other workers.
time management
By Liz Gibbs April 15, 2025
If your to-do list is starting to look more like a novel than a plan for the day, you’re not alone. It’s all too easy to get bogged down by endless tasks, unsure where to start or what really deserves your attention. That’s where the “Must, Should, Could” method comes in—a brilliantly simple way to cut through the clutter and focus on what truly matters.
Solid Business Foundations
By Liz Gibbs April 11, 2025
When it comes to improving your business, think of it like building a house. You wouldn’t add a second floor without ensuring the foundation is rock-solid, right? The same goes for your business.
Personal tax cut
By Liz Gibbs April 10, 2025
On the last sitting day of Parliament, the personal income tax rate reduction announced in the 2025-26 Federal Budget was confirmed.
How does FBT work
By Liz Gibbs March 31, 2025
An overview of FBT. Find out how FBT applies, what you need to do as an employer, and what deductions you can claim.
Odometer readings
By Liz Gibbs March 30, 2025
The Australian Fringe Benefits Tax (FBT) year runs from 1 April to 31 March, and one of the key compliance requirements for employers providing motor vehicles to employees is recording odometer readings on 31 March each year. These readings help determine the taxable value of car fringe benefits and ensure accurate FBT calculations.
Monthly GST Reporting for Small Businesses
By Liz Gibbs March 25, 2025
From 1 April 2025, the ATO will be moving around 3,500 small businesses from quarterly to monthly GST reporting where they have a history of: ❌ non-payment; ❌ late or non-lodgment; or ❌ incorrect reporting. Once the change is implemented, it will remain in place for a minimum of 12 months. Affected small businesses and their tax agents will be contacted by the ATO when their GST reporting cycle is changed. A review process is available for those who don’t believe they have a history of poor compliance and should be able to remain on their current GST reporting cycle. The ATO believes that this will help small businesses improve compliance with their GST obligations and build good business habits. Do you think this is a good move?
Budget 2025-26:
By Liz Gibbs March 25, 2025
In Part 3 of our analysis, we look at the impact on Business & employers, Government & Regulators, and The Economy.
Budget 2025-26:
By Liz Gibbs March 25, 2025
Budget 2025-26 is one that the government clearly did not expect to have to deliver. In Part 2 of our analysis, we look at the impact on Individuals and families.
2025-26 Federal Budget
By Liz Gibbs March 25, 2025
Part 1 of our Budget special: The Government’s big moment in the 2025-26 Federal Budget was the personal income tax cuts. Income tax cuts are a dazzling headline but in reality they deliver a tax saving of up to $268 in the 2026-27 year, with a tax saving of up to $536 from the 2027-28 year.
More Posts