Blog Layout

Death of “backpacker tax”?
Liz Gibbs • November 7, 2021

Death of “backpacker tax”?

The High Court has just handed down what could be a death knell for the so called backpacker tax. Essentially, the Court found that by taxing certain working holiday makers at a higher rate than other Australian residents contravened the non-discrimination clause in the Australian-UK Double Tax Agreement. The decision is expected to apply to working holiday makers from all countries that have a DTA with Australia which includes a non-discrimination clause (ie Chile, Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Turkey, Israel, and the UK).


In a decision with wide reaching implications, the High Court has confirmed once and for all that the so called backpacker tax imposed on a working holiday maker from the UK contravened the non-discrimination clause in the Australia-UK Double Tax Agreement (DTA) and allowed the taxpayer’s appeal.


By way of background, the working holiday rate (“backpacker tax”) generally applied from 1 January 2017 to individuals with either a Subclass 417 (working holiday) or 462 (work and holiday) visas. In essence, the first $37,000 of “working holiday taxable income” is taxed at 15% and then the balance is taxed at the standard rates applicable to residents. Thus, working holiday makers are taxed at a higher rate on the first $37,000 than residents as they do not get the benefit of the tax-free threshold ($18,200 for 2021-22).


The case centred on a British citizen (Ms Addy) who lived in Australia for a period of almost 2 years, unlike other working holiday makers, during most of her time here, she lived in the same share house accommodation in Sydney with a friend and only left for short stints to travel to other parts of Australia. Essentially, the case came down to whether or not Ms Addy was a resident of Australia and that if she was a resident, would the non-discrimination clause (Article 25) in the DTA prevent her from being taxed in a more burdensome way.


The Federal Court initially found in favour of Ms Addy, finding that she was both an Australian resident for tax purposes, and that the DTA prevented Ms Addy from being taxed at the higher working holiday tax rate. However, on appeal, the Full Federal Court held (by majority) that Ms Addy should be taxed at the special rates applicable to working holiday makers as she was not discriminated against on grounds of nationality, rather the backpacker tax imposed tax at differential rates due to the taxpayer in question holding a particular type of visa.


The taxpayer then appealed the decision to the High Court, which found that the more onerous backpacker tax was imposed on Ms Addy due to her nationality. It noted that an Australian national in same circumstances, that is, deriving taxable income from the same source during the same period, would have been taxed at a lower rate. Thus, the High Court found that the non-discrimination clause (Article 25) in the DTA was contravened.


The important thing to note from this case is that this decision will not apply equally to all working holiday makers with either the Subclass 417 (working holiday) or 462 (work and holiday) visas. It will only apply to working holiday makers from countries that have a DTA with Australia that includes a non-discrimination clause. In addition, such working holiday makers will need to first clear the hurdle of meeting the requirements to be an Australian resident for tax purposes.

“A working holiday maker’s residency status for tax purposes is determined by the taxpayer’s individual circumstances. Most working holiday makers will be non-residents consistent with their purpose of being in Australia to have a holiday and working to support that holiday.” – Australian Taxation Office

Countries that have a DTA with Australia which includes a non-discrimination clause consist of Chile, Finland, Germany, Japan, Norway, Turkey, Israel, and the UK. Individuals from a country lacking a DTA or a DTA with an anti-discrimination provision with Australia would still be taxed at the working holiday rate even if they are found to be Australian tax residents.

Need to amend your return?

While the ATO notes that most working holiday makers will be non-residents and hence the decision will not affect them, a small percentage may be entitled to a refund. Guidance is currently being formulated by the ATO, but if you believe you meet the requirements for a refund, we can help you confirm your eligibility and amend your return, if necessary.


Email us at Robert Goodman Accountants at reception@rgoodman.com.au . © Copyright 2021 Thomson Reuters. All rights reserved. Brought to you by Robert Goodman Accountants.

Office open
By Liz Gibbs March 10, 2025
With thanks to all Energex and Emergency services Crew, our electricity has been reconnected and our office is open from today 11 March. We hope you and your loved ones are safe and well following cyclone Alfred. These past few days have been challenging for many, and our thoughts are with everyone affected.
By Liz Gibbs March 10, 2025
Due to a power outage affecting the entire Samford area, the RGA Practice will be operating remotely today, 10 March, until electricity is restored. Please be assured that our team remains available and can be reached at 07 3289 1700. We appreciate your understanding and support during this time. Stay safe, and we look forward to seeing you soon.
Cyclone Alfred
By Liz Gibbs March 5, 2025
As Tropical Cyclone Alfred approaches, we want to remind everyone to take necessary precautions and ensure their safety. We have received some important information that we believe is crucial to share with you to help you prepare for the severe weather conditions ahead.
Work Health and Safety (Sexual Harassment) Amendment Regulation 2024
By Liz Gibbs February 26, 2025
In a significant move to combat workplace sexual harassment, Amendments to the Work Health and Safety Regulation 2011 (as per the Work Health and Safety (Sexual Harassment) Amendment Regulation 2024) will soon commence on 1 March 2025.
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
The amount of money that can be transferred to a tax-free retirement account will increase to $2m on 1 July 2025.
What happens to your super when you die?
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
The Government has announced its intention to introduce mandatory standards for large superannuation funds to, amongst other things, deliver timely and compassionate handling of death benefits. Do we have a problem with paying out super when a member dies?
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
If credit card surcharges are banned in other countries, why not Australia? We look at the surcharge debate and the payment system complexity that has brought us to this point. In the United Kingdom, consumer credit and debit card surcharges have been banned since 2018. In Europe, all except American Express and Diners Club consumer surcharges are banned. And in Australia, there is a push to follow suit. But, is the issue as simple as it seems?
Babyboomer wealth
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
“Succession planning, and the tax risks associated with it, is our number one focus in 2025. In recent years we’ve observed an increase in reorganisations that appear to be connected to succession planning.” ATO Private Wealth Deputy Commissioner Louise Clarke.
Penalty for False R&D claims
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
A joint investigation involving the ATO found that, between 2014 and 2017, a Sydney business coach promoted unlawful tax schemes encouraging clients to lodge over-inflated, inaccurate or unsubstantiated research and development ('R&D') tax incentive claims
SMSF lodgement due dates
By Liz Gibbs February 25, 2025
All trustees of SMSFs with assets (including super contributions or any other investments) as at 30 June 2024 need to lodge an SMSF annual return ('SAR') for the 2023/24 financial year.
More Posts
Share by: